tree 69141de3f1c3aeb34b8125cc27b28270fd6bbfd7
parent 48cea4fd5f941f69790b6e6cfa59b40bda624fda
author Ian Maxon <ian@maxons.email> 1632165194 -0700
committer Ian Maxon <imaxon@uci.edu> 1632365949 +0000

[ASTERIXDB-2968] Fix mixing SQL++ and External UDFs

- user model changes: no
- storage format changes: no
- interface changes: no

Details:

In the inlining of views and SQL++ UDFs, one of the cases
assumes that if a function is not builtin, it must be a SQL++
UDF. And therefore if it is not in the used list of those, it
is missing somehow. This however is the exact case for external
functions, which shouldn't be inlined (at least in the same way)

Change-Id: Idb8d6b5f7876f42169b1c2b92acc586bfaede5da
Reviewed-on: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/13284
Reviewed-by: Ian Maxon <imaxon@uci.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Lychagin <dmitry.lychagin@couchbase.com>
Integration-Tests: Jenkins <jenkins@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Tested-by: Jenkins <jenkins@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Contrib: Ian Maxon <imaxon@uci.edu>